Mailspring/spec/nylas-api-spec.coffee

367 lines
16 KiB
CoffeeScript
Raw Normal View History

_ = require 'underscore'
fs = require 'fs'
Actions = require '../src/flux/actions'
NylasAPI = require '../src/flux/nylas-api'
Thread = require('../src/flux/models/thread').default
Message = require('../src/flux/models/message').default
AccountStore = require '../src/flux/stores/account-store'
DatabaseStore = require '../src/flux/stores/database-store'
DatabaseTransaction = require('../src/flux/stores/database-transaction').default
describe "NylasAPI", ->
describe "authPlugin", ->
beforeEach ->
NylasAPI.pluginsSupported = true
@authGetResponse = null
@authPostResponse = null
@error = null
@resolved = false
spyOn(NylasEnv.config, 'set')
spyOn(NylasEnv.config, 'get').andReturn(null)
spyOn(NylasAPI, 'makeRequest').andCallFake (options) =>
return @authGetResponse if options.method is 'GET' and @authGetResponse
return @authPostResponse if options.method is 'POST' and @authPostResponse
return new Promise (resolve, reject) -> #never respond
it "should reject if the current environment does not support plugins", ->
NylasAPI.pluginsSupported = false
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', TEST_ACCOUNT_ID).catch (err) => @error = err
waitsFor =>
@error
runs =>
expect(@error.message).toEqual('Sorry, this feature is only available when N1 is running against the hosted version of the Nylas Sync Engine.')
it "should reject if no account can be found for the given accountOrId", ->
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', 'randomAccountId').catch (err) => @error = err
waitsFor =>
@error
runs =>
expect(@error.message).toEqual('Invalid account')
it "should resolve if the plugin has been successfully authed with accountOrId already", ->
jasmine.unspy(NylasEnv.config, 'get')
spyOn(NylasEnv.config, 'get').andCallFake (key) =>
return Date.now() if key is "plugins.PID.lastAuth.#{TEST_ACCOUNT_ID}"
return null
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', TEST_ACCOUNT_ID).then (err) =>
@resolved = true
waitsFor =>
@resolved
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
describe "check for existing auth", ->
it "should GET /auth/plugin to check if the plugin has been authed", ->
@authGetResponse = Promise.resolve({authed: true})
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', TEST_ACCOUNT_ID)
advanceClock()
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
returnsModel: false,
method: 'GET',
accountId: 'test-account-server-id',
path: '/auth/plugin?client_id=PID'
})
it "should record a successful auth in the config and resolve without making a POST", ->
@authGetResponse = Promise.resolve({authed: true})
@authPostResponse = null
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', TEST_ACCOUNT_ID).then => @resolved = true
waitsFor =>
@resolved
runs =>
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(NylasEnv.config.set.mostRecentCall.args[0]).toEqual("plugins.PID.lastAuth.#{TEST_ACCOUNT_ID}")
it "should propagate any network errors back to the caller", ->
@authGetResponse = Promise.reject(new Error("Network failure!"))
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', TEST_ACCOUNT_ID).catch (err) => @error = err
advanceClock()
advanceClock()
expect(@error.message).toBe("Network failure!")
expect(NylasEnv.config.set).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
describe "request for auth", ->
it "should POST to /auth/plugin with the client id and record a successful auth", ->
@authGetResponse = Promise.resolve({authed: false})
@authPostResponse = Promise.resolve({authed: true})
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', TEST_ACCOUNT_ID).then => @resolved = true
waitsFor =>
@resolved
runs =>
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest.calls[0].args[0]).toEqual({
returnsModel: false,
method: 'GET',
accountId: 'test-account-server-id',
path: '/auth/plugin?client_id=PID'
})
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest.calls[1].args[0]).toEqual({
returnsModel: false,
method: 'POST',
accountId: 'test-account-server-id',
path: '/auth/plugin',
body: {client_id: 'PID'},
json: true
})
setCall = NylasEnv.config.set.mostRecentCall
expect(setCall.args[0]).toEqual("plugins.PID.lastAuth.#{TEST_ACCOUNT_ID}")
it "should propagate any network errors back to the caller", ->
@authGetResponse = Promise.resolve({authed: false})
@authPostResponse = Promise.reject(new Error("Network failure!"))
NylasAPI.authPlugin('PID', 'PSECRET', TEST_ACCOUNT_ID).catch (err) => @error = err
waitsFor =>
@error
runs =>
expect(@error.message).toBe("Network failure!")
describe "handleModel404", ->
it "should unpersist the model from the cache that was requested", ->
model = new Thread(id: 'threadidhere')
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
spyOn(DatabaseTransaction.prototype, 'unpersistModel')
spyOn(DatabaseStore, 'find').andCallFake (klass, id) =>
return Promise.resolve(model)
NylasAPI._handleModel404("/threads/#{model.id}")
advanceClock()
expect(DatabaseStore.find).toHaveBeenCalledWith(Thread, model.id)
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
expect(DatabaseTransaction.prototype.unpersistModel).toHaveBeenCalledWith(model)
it "should not do anything if the model is not in the cache", ->
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
spyOn(DatabaseTransaction.prototype, 'unpersistModel')
spyOn(DatabaseStore, 'find').andCallFake (klass, id) =>
return Promise.resolve(null)
NylasAPI._handleModel404("/threads/1234")
advanceClock()
expect(DatabaseStore.find).toHaveBeenCalledWith(Thread, '1234')
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
expect(DatabaseTransaction.prototype.unpersistModel).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith()
it "should not do anything bad if it doesn't recognize the class", ->
spyOn(DatabaseStore, 'find')
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
spyOn(DatabaseTransaction.prototype, 'unpersistModel')
waitsForPromise ->
NylasAPI._handleModel404("/asdasdasd/1234")
runs ->
expect(DatabaseStore.find).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
expect(DatabaseTransaction.prototype.unpersistModel).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
it "should not do anything bad if the endpoint only has a single segment", ->
spyOn(DatabaseStore, 'find')
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
spyOn(DatabaseTransaction.prototype, 'unpersistModel')
waitsForPromise ->
NylasAPI._handleModel404("/account")
runs ->
expect(DatabaseStore.find).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
expect(DatabaseTransaction.prototype.unpersistModel).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
describe "handleAuthenticationFailure", ->
it "should put the account in an `invalid` state", ->
spyOn(Actions, 'updateAccount')
spyOn(AccountStore, 'tokenForAccountId').andReturn('token')
NylasAPI._handleAuthenticationFailure('/threads/1234', 'token')
expect(Actions.updateAccount).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(Actions.updateAccount.mostRecentCall.args).toEqual([AccountStore.accounts()[0].id, {syncState: 'invalid'}])
it "should not throw an exception if the account cannot be found", ->
spyOn(Actions, 'updateAccount')
NylasAPI._handleAuthenticationFailure('/threads/1234', 'token')
expect(Actions.updateAccount).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
describe "handleModelResponse", ->
beforeEach ->
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
spyOn(DatabaseTransaction.prototype, "persistModels").andCallFake (models) ->
Promise.resolve(models)
stubDB = ({models, testClass, testMatcher}) ->
spyOn(DatabaseStore, "findAll").andCallFake (klass) ->
testClass?(klass)
where: (matcher) ->
testMatcher?(matcher)
Promise.resolve(models)
it "should reject if no JSON is provided", ->
waitsForPromise ->
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse()
.then -> throw new Error("Should reject!")
.catch (err) ->
expect(err.message).toEqual "handleModelResponse with no JSON provided"
it "should resolve if an empty JSON array is provided", ->
waitsForPromise ->
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse([])
.then (resp) ->
expect(resp).toEqual []
describe "if JSON contains objects which are of unknown types", ->
it "should warn and resolve", ->
spyOn(console, "warn")
waitsForPromise ->
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse([{id: 'a', object: 'unknown'}])
.then (resp) ->
expect(resp).toEqual []
expect(console.warn).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(console.warn.calls.length).toBe 1
describe "if JSON contains the same object more than once", ->
beforeEach ->
stubDB(models: [])
spyOn(console, "warn")
@dupes = [
{id: 'a', object: 'thread'}
{id: 'a', object: 'thread'}
{id: 'b', object: 'thread'}
]
it "should warn", ->
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(@dupes)
.then ->
expect(console.warn).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(console.warn.calls.length).toBe 1
it "should omit duplicates", ->
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(@dupes)
.then ->
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
models = DatabaseTransaction.prototype.persistModels.calls[0].args[0]
expect(models.length).toBe 2
expect(models[0].id).toBe 'a'
expect(models[1].id).toBe 'b'
describe "when items in the JSON are locked and we are not accepting changes to them", ->
it "should remove locked models from the set", ->
json = [
{id: 'a', object: 'thread'}
{id: 'b', object: 'thread'}
]
spyOn(NylasAPI._lockTracker, "acceptRemoteChangesTo").andCallFake (klass, id) ->
if id is "a" then return false
stubDB models: [new Thread(json[1])], testMatcher: (whereMatcher) ->
expect(whereMatcher.val).toEqual 'b'
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(json)
.then (models) ->
expect(models.length).toBe 1
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
models = DatabaseTransaction.prototype.persistModels.calls[0].args[0]
expect(models.length).toBe 1
expect(models[0].id).toBe 'b'
describe "when updating models", ->
Message = require('../src/flux/models/message').default
beforeEach ->
@json = [
{id: 'a', object: 'draft', unread: true}
{id: 'b', object: 'draft', starred: true}
]
@existing = new Message(id: 'b', unread: true)
stubDB models: [@existing]
verifyUpdateHappened = (responseModels) ->
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
changedModels = DatabaseTransaction.prototype.persistModels.calls[0].args[0]
expect(changedModels.length).toBe 2
expect(changedModels[1].id).toBe 'b'
expect(changedModels[1].starred).toBe true
# Doesn't override existing values
expect(changedModels[1].unread).toBe true
expect(responseModels.length).toBe 2
expect(responseModels[0].id).toBe 'a'
expect(responseModels[0].unread).toBe true
it "updates found models with new data", ->
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(@json).then verifyUpdateHappened
it "updates if the json version is newer", ->
@existing.version = 9
@json[1].version = 10
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(@json).then verifyUpdateHappened
verifyUpdateStopped = (responseModels) ->
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
changedModels = DatabaseTransaction.prototype.persistModels.calls[0].args[0]
expect(changedModels.length).toBe 1
expect(changedModels[0].id).toBe 'a'
expect(changedModels[0].unread).toBe true
expect(responseModels.length).toBe 2
expect(responseModels[1].id).toBe 'b'
expect(responseModels[1].starred).toBeUndefined()
it "doesn't update if the json version is older", ->
@existing.version = 10
@json[1].version = 9
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(@json).then verifyUpdateStopped
it "doesn't update if it's already sent", ->
@existing.draft = false
@json[1].draft = true
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(@json).then verifyUpdateStopped
describe "handling all types of objects", ->
apiObjectToClassMap =
"file": require('../src/flux/models/file')
"event": require('../src/flux/models/event')
"label": require('../src/flux/models/label')
"folder": require('../src/flux/models/folder')
"thread": require('../src/flux/models/thread').default
"draft": require('../src/flux/models/message').default
"account": require('../src/flux/models/account').default
"message": require('../src/flux/models/message').default
"contact": require('../src/flux/models/contact')
"calendar": require('../src/flux/models/calendar')
verifyUpdateHappened = (klass, responseModels) ->
feat(transactions): Explicit (and faster) database transactions Summary: Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction. You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff: - Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/ the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers. - Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross. - Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`: BAD: ``` DatabaseStore.atomically => DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER: ``` DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) => t.persistModel(draft) .then => GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise ``` Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-) Other changes: - This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large. - This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster. Test Plan: Run tests! Reviewers: juan, evan Reviewed By: juan, evan Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
2015-12-18 03:46:05 +08:00
changedModels = DatabaseTransaction.prototype.persistModels.calls[0].args[0]
expect(changedModels.length).toBe 2
expect(changedModels[0].id).toBe 'a'
expect(changedModels[1].id).toBe 'b'
expect(changedModels[0] instanceof klass).toBe true
expect(changedModels[1] instanceof klass).toBe true
expect(responseModels.length).toBe 2
expect(responseModels[0].id).toBe 'a'
expect(responseModels[1].id).toBe 'b'
expect(responseModels[0] instanceof klass).toBe true
expect(responseModels[1] instanceof klass).toBe true
_.forEach apiObjectToClassMap, (klass, type) ->
it "properly handle the '#{type}' type", ->
json = [
{id: 'a', object: type}
{id: 'b', object: type}
]
stubDB models: [new klass(id: 'b')]
verifyUpdate = _.partial(verifyUpdateHappened, klass)
waitsForPromise =>
NylasAPI._handleModelResponse(json).then verifyUpdate
describe "makeDraftDeletionRequest", ->
it "should make an API request to delete the draft", ->
draft = new Message(accountId: TEST_ACCOUNT_ID, draft: true, clientId: 'asd', serverId: 'asd')
spyOn(NylasAPI, 'makeRequest')
NylasAPI.makeDraftDeletionRequest(draft)
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest.callCount).toBe 1
req = NylasAPI.makeRequest.calls[0].args[0]
expect(req.path).toBe "/drafts/#{draft.serverId}"
expect(req.accountId).toBe TEST_ACCOUNT_ID
expect(req.method).toBe "DELETE"
expect(req.returnsModel).toBe false
it "should increment the change tracker, preventing any further deltas about the draft", ->
draft = new Message(accountId: TEST_ACCOUNT_ID, draft: true, clientId: 'asd', serverId: 'asd')
spyOn(NylasAPI, 'incrementRemoteChangeLock')
NylasAPI.makeDraftDeletionRequest(draft)
expect(NylasAPI.incrementRemoteChangeLock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(Message, draft.serverId)
it "should not return a promise or anything else, to avoid accidentally making things dependent on the request", ->
draft = new Message(accountId: TEST_ACCOUNT_ID, draft: true, clientId: 'asd', serverId: 'asd')
a = NylasAPI.makeDraftDeletionRequest(draft)
expect(a).toBe(undefined)
it "should not do anything if the draft is missing a serverId", ->
draft = new Message(accountId: TEST_ACCOUNT_ID, draft: true, clientId: 'asd', serverId: null)
spyOn(NylasAPI, 'makeRequest')
NylasAPI.makeDraftDeletionRequest(draft)
expect(NylasAPI.makeRequest).not.toHaveBeenCalled()