Commit graph

18 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Evan Morikawa
837627aa39 feat(babel6): 1,774 linter errors 2016-05-06 11:55:46 -07:00
Ben Gotow
f0be73cdc4 fix(focus): Always set selection range into editor on focus 2016-05-05 11:53:58 -07:00
Juan Tejada
2c986f2cd0 fix(composer): Properly setup editing action listeners on update
- This prevented emoji selection via the popover from working on a new
window because the plugin is loaded after the contenteditable sets up
the action listeners, so we need to re set them on update
2016-05-04 16:25:42 -07:00
Juan Tejada
6e0e70ddf7 fix(composer-editor): Remove dead code 2016-05-04 15:02:38 -07:00
Ben Gotow
105e33c9c4 fix(mail-merge): Fix drag and drop for files vs. chips 2016-04-29 11:57:43 -07:00
Juan Tejada
2dccde2e58 feat(mail-merge): Add mail merge plugin
Summary:
Adds Mail Merge Plugin
- Adds new table components to component kit
- Adds new extension points to allow dragging and dropping into composer contenteditable and participant fields and customizing participant fields
- Adds new decorators and other misc updates
- #1608

Test Plan: TODO

Reviewers: bengotow, evan

Reviewed By: bengotow, evan

Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2895
2016-04-22 18:29:07 -07:00
Ben Gotow
b4434f6617 fix(focus): Remove focusedField in favor of imperative focus, break apart ComposerView
Summary:
- Removes controlled focus in the composer!
  - No React components ever perfom focus in lifecycle methods. Never again.
  - A new `Utils.schedule({action, after, timeout})` helper makes it easy to say "setState or load draft, etc. and then focus"
  - The DraftStore issues a focusDraft action after creating a draft, which causes the MessageList to focus and scroll to the desired composer, which itself decides which field to focus.
  - The MessageList never focuses anything automatically.
- Refactors ComposerView apart — ComposerHeader handles all top fields, DraftSessionContainer handles draft session initialization and exposes props to ComposerView
  - ComposerHeader now uses a KeyCommandRegion (with focusIn and focusOut) to do the expanding and collapsing of the participants fields. May rename that container very soon.
- Removes all CommandRegistry handling of tab and shift-tab. Unless you preventDefault, the browser does it's thing.
- Removes all tabIndexes greater than 1. This is an anti-pattern—assigning everything a tabIndex of 0 tells the browser to move between them based on their order in the DOM, and is almost always what you want.
- Adds "TabGroupRegion" which allows you to create a tab/shift-tabbing group, (so tabbing does not leave the active composer). Can't believe this isn't a browser feature.

Todos:
- Occasionally, clicking out of the composer contenteditable requires two clicks. This is because atomicEdit is restoring selection within the contenteditable and breaking blur.
- Because the ComposerView does not render until it has a draft, we're back to it being white in popout composers for a brief moment. We will fix this another way - all the "return unless draft" statements were untenable.
- Clicking a row in the thread list no longer shifts focus to the message list and focuses the last draft. This will be restored soon.

Test Plan: Broken

Reviewers: juan, evan

Reviewed By: juan, evan

Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2814
2016-04-04 15:22:01 -07:00
Ben Gotow
9099542643 fix(quoted-text): div vs blockquote, signature cleanup #1746
Summary:
Previously we always created <blockquote class="gmail_quote"> to wrap quoted text. This is not correct.
Gmail uses blockquotes only when it wants visual indentation, and <div>s to wrap other quoted text, like forwarded
messages which are not displayed indented.

This diff updates N1 to match Gmail exactly. Note that for replies, Gmail actually nests a blockquote.gmail_quote
inside a div.gmail_quote.

I also updated signature handling because it turns out the regexp that was removing existing signatures would blow
away any and all divs until it reached a <blockquote> tag.

Test Plan: See updated specs. Manually tested by creating a thread in Google Inbox and then performing fwd and reply in both N1 and Inbox. Results match.

Reviewers: juan, evan

Reviewed By: evan

Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2750
2016-03-17 13:11:00 -07:00
Evan Morikawa
e77d658a96 fix(composer): focus on the absolute end when clicking near the bottom 2016-02-25 13:31:34 -08:00
Evan Morikawa
7edfe3853f fix(messages): fix jumping message list on draft focus
We were erroneously jumping to an individual message when you focused on
it.
2016-02-15 16:34:23 -05:00
Juan Tejada
7a8e10af0d fix(lint): Fix new eslint rule introduced with babel-eslint upgrade.
See https://phabricator.babeljs.io/T6925
2016-02-01 20:07:36 -08:00
Evan Morikawa
c7a685630d refactor(toolbar): allow toolbar extensions in contenteditable
Summary:
This is a refactor of the toolbar in the contenteditable. Goals of this
are:

1. Allow developers to add new buttons to the toolbar
2. Allow developers to add other component types to the floating toolbar (like the LinkEditor)
3. Make the toolbar declaratively defined instead of imperatively set
4. Separate out logical units of the toolbar into individual sections
5. Clean up `innerState` of the Contenteditable

The Floating Toolbar used to be an imperative mess. Doing simple
functionality additions required re-understanding a very complex set of
logic to hide and show the toolbar and delecately manage focus states.
There also was no real capacity for any developer to extend the toolbar.

It also used to be completely outside of our `atomicEdit` system and was a
legacy of having raw access to contenteditable controls (since it all used
to be directly inside of the contenteditable)

Finally it was difficult to declaratively define things because the
`innerState` of the Contenteditable was inconsistently used and its
lifecycle not properly thought through. This fixed several lifecycle bugs
with that.

Along the way several of the DOMUtils methods were also subtly not
functional and fixed.

The Toolbar is now broken apart into separate logical units.

There are now `ContentedtiableExtension`s that declare what should be
displayed in the toolbar at any given moment.

They define a method called `toolbarComponentData`. This is a pure
function of the state of the `Contenteditable`. If selection and content
conditions look correct, then that method will return a component to
render. This is how we declaratively define whether a toolbar should be
visible or not instead of manually setting `hide` & `show` bits.

There is also a `toolbarButtons` method that declaratively defines buttons
that can go in the new `<ToolbarButtons>` component.

The `ToolbarButtonManager` takes care of extracting these and binding the
correct editorAPI context.

Now the `<LinkEditor>` is a separate component from the `<ToolbarButtons>`
instead of being smashed together.

The `LinkManager` takes care of declaring when the `LinkEditor` should be
displayed and has properly bound methods to update the `contenteditable`
through the standard `atomicEdit` interface.

If users have additional contenteditable popup plugins (like displaying
extra info on a name or some content in the composer), they can now
implement the `toolbarComponentData` api and declaratively define that
information based on the state of the contenteditable.

Test Plan: TODO

Reviewers: bengotow, juan

Reviewed By: bengotow

Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2442
2016-01-20 14:35:20 -08:00
Juan Tejada
57aee26256 fix(composer): Fix focus behavior when signature present and when
clicking outside:

- When focusing the composer via click inside the contenteditable region or via
tabbing, last text node before the signature (or blockquotes) will be focused.
- When focusing composer by clicking outside contenteditable region, it
  will default to default contenteditable focus behavior via new method:
  `nativeFocus`
2016-01-12 12:36:19 -08:00
Ben Gotow
893e26dfc6 fix(composer): Focus last element, not just text node 2016-01-11 17:44:17 -08:00
Ben Gotow
b3841d79e6 fix(composer): Temporary patch for broken focus
Long term, we need to refactor this so that it's either entirely controlled or uncontrolled. Potentially use focusin?
2016-01-08 18:45:26 -08:00
Ben Gotow
1d94fcaaf9 fix(sig): Remove selectEnd, place cursor before sig
Summary: When focusing the composer, select the end of the last text block above any signatures / quoted text (which can be visible by default in Fwd:).

Test Plan: Run tests

Reviewers: juan, evan

Reviewed By: evan

Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2411
2016-01-05 14:31:55 -08:00
Ben Gotow
7f80cc8038 fix(focus): Minor changes to composer focus logic to focus new drafts
Summary:
Remove FocusTrackingRegion—all CommandRegions should be focusable, and nesting the two creates varying behavior based on which is the parent

Calling focus() on an injected / unsafe component should always do /something/. Try the inner React method, inner DOM method, or call on ourselves

Rename contentEditable._focusEditor to "focus" since it intends to replace default focus behavior

In ComposerView, always change focus via setState, never by calling focus() directly. Rather than tracking `_lastFocusedField`, just focus whenever the activeElement isnt within the focusedField. Make body initial focus when draft is pristine...

...(ensures new drafts are focused)

Test Plan: Run tests

Reviewers: evan, juan

Reviewed By: evan, juan

Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2406
2016-01-05 11:34:26 -08:00
Juan Tejada
96da7ccb2d feat(editor-region): Add support to register components as editors
Summary:
- The main purpose of this is to be able to properly register the editor for the markdown plugin (and any other plugins to come)

- Refactors ComposerView and Contenteditable ->
  - Replaces Contenteditable with an InjectedComponent for a new region role:
    "Composer:Editor"
  - Creates a new component called ComposerEditor, which is the one that is
    being registered by default as "Composer:Editor"
  - I used this class to try to standardize the props that should be
    passed to any would be editor Component:
    - Renamed a bunch of the props which (I think) had a bit of
      confusing names
    - Added a bunch of docs for these in the source file, although
      I feel like those docs should live elsewhere, like in the
      ComponentRegion docs.
  - In the process, I ended up pulling some stuff out of ComposerView and
    some stuff out of the Contenteditable, namely:
    - The scrolling logic to ensure that the composer is visible while
      typing was moved outside of the Contenteditable -- this feels more
      like the ComposerEditor's responsibility, especially since the
      Contenteditable is meant to be used in other contexts as well.
    - The ComposerExtensions state; it feels less awkward for me if this
      is inside the ComposerEditor because 1) ComposerView does less
      things, 2) these are actually just being passed to the
      Contenteditable, 3) I feel like other plugins shouldn't need to
      mess around with ComposerExtensions, so we shouldn't pass them to the
      editor. If you register an editor different from our default one,
      any other ComposerExtension callbacks will be disabled, which
      I feel is expected behavior.
  - I think there is still some more refactoring to be done, and I left some TODOS
    here and there, but I think this diff is already big enough and its a minimal
    set of changes to get the markdown editor working in a not so duck
    tapish way.
- New props for InjectedComponent:
  - `requiredMethods`: allows you to define a collection of methods that
    should be implemented by any Component that registers for your
    desired region.
    - It will throw an error if these are not implemented
    - It will automatically pass calls made on the InjectedComponent to these methods
      down to the instance of the actual registered component
    - Would love some comments on this approach and impl
  - `fallback`: allows you to define a default component to use if none were
    registered through the ComponentRegistry
- Misc:
  - Added a new test case for the QuotedHTMLTransformer
- Tests:
  - They were minimally updated so that they don't break, but a big TODO
    is to properly refactor them. I plan to do that in an upcoming
    diff.

Test Plan: - Unit tests

Reviewers: bengotow, evan

Reviewed By: evan

Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2372
2015-12-18 11:06:44 -08:00