Summary: Shortens and simplifies UI variables so that unused variables are no longer present.
Test Plan: Tested locally.
Reviewers: evan, bengotow
Reviewed By: bengotow
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2738
Summary:
WIP. I added a collection index to make displaying the threads of a
currently selected participant on the sidebar easy and fast.
The problem is that the `participants` of a thread, while a collection of
`Contact` objects, have no "ids" for those contact objects.
One idea was to create the join table but access contacts by email instead
of id. This required a minor change to the way the data is entered in the
join table.
This means the sidebar can now simply do:
`DatabaseStore.findAll(Thread).where(Thread.attributes.participants.contains('foo@bar.com'))`
While I didn't for this initial test, we could also/instead create the
`Message-Contact` join table. The trick about a Message-Contact table is
that I believe we'd have to create additional columns further specifying
which field we're interested in.
The following two queries:
`DatabaseStore.findAll(Message).where(Message.attributes.to.contains('foo@bar.com'))`
`DatabaseStore.findAll(Message).where(Message.attributes.from.contains('foo@bar.com'))`
would require additional columns in the `Message-Contact` join table
because currently the only columns are `id` and `value`.
In the case of the sidebar use case, I think the Thread participants is
what you want to see anyway.
Unfortunately an email-centric scheme can't distinguish between
`noreply@phab.com <Evan>` and `noreply@phab.com <Juan>`. I actually think
this may be a good thing since I think most people think in terms of email
address as the unique key anyway and for the use case of showing related
emails in the sidebar I'd rather overshow than undershow.
This solution seems to be working pretty well in initial testing, but I
want to see if you guys can think of anything this may subtly screw up
down the line, or if you can think of a simpler way to do this.
Test Plan: todo
Reviewers: juan, bengotow
Reviewed By: bengotow
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2687
Summary:
By default, the messages in a thread are now filtered to exclude
ones moved to trash or spam. You can choose to view those messages by clicking
the new bar in the message list.
When you view your spam or trash, we only show the messages on those threads
that have been marked as spam/trash.
Test Plan: Run a couple new tests
Reviewers: juan, evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2662
Summary: Removes the MessageListNotificationBar editable component in favor of the existing MessageListHeaders
Test Plan: Manually built N1 and verified the MessageListNotificationBar no longer appears as editable component.
Reviewers: bengotow
Reviewed By: bengotow
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2523
Summary:
- `from` participants now have their own line
- `to` participants in collapsed mode merge `to`, `cc`, `bcc` as in
gmail, and start in separate line from `from`
- number of `to` participants in collapsed mode is limited, and also overflows
with an ellipsis with css in case its too long
- /some/ cleanup
- Unsuccessfully tried to update the css for the message item header to convert to a flexbox. Wrapping the `from` address when the text is too long is still a TODO
- Fixes#1113
Test Plan: - Manual
Reviewers: bengotow, evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2507
Summary:
- Works like Gmail does
- Adds specs
Test Plan: - Unit tests
Reviewers: evan, bengotow
Reviewed By: bengotow
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2301
- The FocusedContactStore was triggering too often, and leaving it up to the FullcontactStore to fetch the full Contact model for the focused contact (pulled from thread.)
The FocusedContactStore triggers more responsibly, and registering for the role "MessageListSidebar:ContactCard" now gives you the focused contact as a full database model. The whole ContactCard region also fades in and out.
Summary: moved non-view logic outside of the render function, which also helped for testing purposes
Test Plan: added a test, but this also leaves the window open for testing the other use cases beyond T3377. not sure whether we should add tests for this patch or for another ticket.
Reviewers: evan
Reviewed By: evan
Maniphest Tasks: T3377
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D1916
Summary:
fix(undo-redo): UndoRedoComponent does not take props
fix(category-picker):
- Use Actions.queueTask like the rest of the app so UndoRedoStore can see it. Can change this in the future but it's currently the only place in the app we directly queue tasks.
- Stop subscribing to the FocusedContentStore / FocusedCategoryStore (which are not used in setState?) since we receive threads as props
- Rename categoryDatum to item because it's not a category. (Was super confused that categories were becoming JSON in `_extendCategoryWithDisplayData`) Give item a category property so that tasks can specify items and not IDs (allows for better descriptions like "Moved one thread to Archive"
Add simple shouldComponentUpdate to retina-img
Test Plan: Run tests
Reviewers: evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D1832
Summary: This is still a work in progress and needs more specs
Test Plan: Run tests
Reviewers: evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D1808
Summary:
The popover class now will adjust itself until it fits within the window
frame. You don't see the intermediate state in the double render.
Test Plan: edgehill --test
Reviewers: bengotow
Reviewed By: bengotow
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D1795
Summary:
- New control will likely be shortlived - SDW mocking up replacement for when settings UI lands
- New action for toggling location hidden
- New rule for mail labels: can't remove "Sent"
Test Plan: Run tests - none new atm
Reviewers: evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D1782
React-dnd is a nice library but it assumes it's going to be the only thing managing your drag and drop in the entire app. It also hides the underlying dataTransfer object so it's difficult to implement native drag and drop behaviors other than for Files and Urls, which they special-case.
Implementing it manually really isn't hard, and we can do things like attach a text/plain version of contact data to the contact drag.
Fixes T2054
Summary:
consolidate all the "untitled" stuff into a convenience method on the File itself. Previously it'd show "Unnamed Attachment", download as "Untitled" and open as "<file.id>". Now it's consistent everywhere and chooses names based on the contenttype (Event.ics).
Rewrite CSS rules for uploads and attachments to be simpler
- remove container divs and classnames from things that have no CSS
- switch to using Flexbox so it's not necesary to have so many containers
- remove zIndex hacks, apply overflow rules to name div only, so long filenames don't make action button unclickable
- consolidate CSS classnames for uploads/attachments
-
Other style fixes
- cursor "default" instead of text insertion on image attachments
- cursor "default" on action buttons
- image uplaods / attachments with long filenames truncate with ellpsis
- attachments are not indented by an extra 15px in message bodies
Prevent progress bar overflow (was ending above 100%, 100.12315%...)
Update FileDownloadStore so it never creates Download objects when file is downloaded already
- Previously, the download itself decided if it would be a no-op, but this meant the download was around for a split second and you'd see progress indicators flash for a moment when opening/saving an attachment.
Upgrade FileDownloadStore use of promises
Restore Image attachment drag and drop - was broken because the name gradient thing was covering the entire drag region.
Allow file attachments to be drag and dropped to the finder and other applications 😍😍😍
Test Plan: Tests still pass
Reviewers: evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D1745
Summary:
This diff does a couple things:
- Undo redo with a new undo/redo store that maintains it's own queue of undo/redo tasks. This queue is separate from the TaskQueue because not all tasks should be considered for undo history! Right now just the AddRemoveTagsTask is undoable.
- NylasAPI.makeRequest now returns a promise which resolves with the result or rejects with an error. For things that still need them, there's still `success` and `error` callbacks. I also added `started:(req) ->` which allows you to get the underlying request.
- Aborting a NylasAPI request now makes it call it's error callback / promise reject.
- You can now run code after perform local has completed using this syntax:
```
task = new AddRemoveTagsTask(focused, ['archive'], ['inbox'])
task.waitForPerformLocal().then ->
Actions.setFocus(collection: 'thread', item: nextFocus)
Actions.setCursorPosition(collection: 'thread', item: nextKeyboard)
Actions.queueTask(task)
```
- In specs, you can now use `advanceClock` to get through a Promise.then/catch/finally. Turns out it was using something low level and not using setTimeout(0).
- The TaskQueue uses promises better and defers a lot of the complexity around queueState for performLocal/performRemote to a task subclass called APITask. APITask implements "perform" and breaks it into "performLocal" and "performRemote".
- All tasks either resolve or reject. They're always removed from the queue, unless they resolve with Task.Status.Retry, which means they internally did a .catch (err) => Promise.resolve(Task.Status.Retry) and they want to be run again later.
- API tasks retry until they succeed or receive a NylasAPI.PermanentErrorCode (400,404,500), in which case they revert and finish.
- The AddRemoveTags Task can now take more than one thread! This is super cool because you can undo/redo a bulk action and also because we'll probably have a bulk tag modification API endpoint soon.
Getting undo / redo working revealed that the thread versioning system we built isn't working because the server was incrementing things by more than 1 at a time. Now we count the number of unresolved "optimistic" changes we've made to a given model, and only accept the server's version of it once the number of optimistic changes is back at zero.
Known Issues:
- AddRemoveTagsTasks aren't dependent on each other, so if you (undo/redo x lots) and then come back online, all the tasks try to add / remove all the tags at the same time. To fix this we can either allow the tasks to be merged together into a minimal set or make them block on each other.
- When Offline, you still get errors in the console for GET requests. Need to catch these and display an offline status bar.
- The metadata tasks haven't been updated yet to the new API. Wanted to get it reviewed first!
Test Plan: All the tests still pass!
Reviewers: evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D1694
