Summary:
This diff replaces "finalizeSessionBeforeSending" with a
plugin hook that is bidirectional and allows us to put the draft in
the "ready to send" state every time we save it, and restore it to
the "ready to edit" state every time a draft session is created to
edit it.
This diff also significantly restructures the draft tasks:
1. SyncbackDraftUploadsTask:
- ensures that `uploads` are converted to `files` and that any
existing files on the draft are part of the correct account.
1. SyncbackDraftTask:
- saves the draft, nothing else.
3. SendDraftTask
- sends the draft, nothing else.
- deletes the entire uploads directory for the draft
Test Plan: WIP
Reviewers: juan, evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2753
Summary:
Previously, we have saved drafts back to the user's provider through the sync engine. There are a handful of very serious edge case issues we're working to solve that are creating a bad user experience. (#933, #1175, #1504, #1237)
For now, we're going to change the behavior of N1 to mitagate these issues.
- If you create a draft in N1, we will not sync it to other mail clients while you're working on it.
- If you enable send later, we'll start syncing the draft to the server as before.
- If you created the draft in another client, we'll sync the draft to the server as before.
Fix specs
Test Plan: Run specs
Reviewers: evan, juan
Reviewed By: juan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2706
Summary:
1. **Generic CUD Tasks**: There is now a generic `CreateModelTask`,
`UpdateModelTask`, and `DestroyModelTask`. These can either be used as-is
or trivially overridden to easily update simple objects. Hopefully all of
the boilerplate rollback, error handling, and undo logic won't have to be
re-duplicated on every task. There are also tests for these tasks. We use
them to perform mutating actions on `Metadata` objects.
1. **Failing on Promise Rejects**: Turns out that if a Promise rejected
due to an error or `Promise.reject` we were ignoring it and letting tests
pass. Now, tests will Fail if any unhandled promise rejects. This
uncovered a variety of errors throughout the test suite that had to be
fixed. The most significant one was during the `theme-manager` tests when
all packages (and their stores with async DB requests) was loaded. Long
after the `theme-manager` specs finished, those DB requests were
(somtimes) silently failing.
1. **Globally stub `DatabaseStore._query`**: All tests shouldn't actually
make queries on the database. Furthremore, the `inTransaction` block
doesn't resolve at all unless `_query` is stubbed. Instead of manually
remembering to do this in every test that touches the DB, it's now mocked
in `spec_helper`. This broke a handful of tests that needed to be manually
fixed.
1. **ESLint Fixes**: Some minor fixes to the linter config to prevent
yelling about minor ES6 things and ensuring we have the correct parser.
Test Plan: new tests
Reviewers: bengotow, juan, drew
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2419
Remove cloudState and N1-Send-Later
Summary:
This is a WIP for the new send draft logic.
I'll add tests then update the diff
Test Plan: todo
Reviewers: bengotow, juan
Reviewed By: juan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2341
Summary:
Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction.
You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff:
- Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/
the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers.
- Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross.
- Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`:
BAD:
```
DatabaseStore.atomically =>
DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) =>
GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise
```
OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER:
```
DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>
t.persistModel(draft)
.then =>
GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise
```
Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-)
Other changes:
- This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large.
- This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster.
Test Plan: Run tests!
Reviewers: juan, evan
Reviewed By: juan, evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
