Summary: after refactoring some things last week and spending time futsing with coffeescript, I’m pretty convinced it’s worth moving important parts of the app to ES6 to be able to use ESLint as part of our dev workflow
Test Plan: Run existing tests, tested manually. Did not convert the tests in this diff, breaking one part at a time!
Reviewers: evan, juan
Reviewed By: juan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2768
Summary:
The goal is to let us see what plugins are throwing errors on Sentry.
We are using a Sentry `tag` to identify and group plugins and their
errors.
Along the way, I cleaned up the error catching and reporting system. There
was a lot of duplicate error logic (that wasn't always right) and some
legacy Atom error handling.
Now, if you catch an error that we should report (like when handling
extensions), call `NylasEnv.reportError`. This used to be called
`emitError` but I changed it to `reportError` to be consistent with the
ErrorReporter and be a bit more indicative of what it does.
In the production version, the `ErrorLogger` will forward the request to
the `nylas-private-error-reporter` which will report to Sentry.
The `reportError` function also now inspects the stack to determine which
plugin(s) it came from. These are passed along to Sentry.
I also cleaned up the `console.log` and `console.error` code. We were
logging errors multiple times making the console confusing to read. Worse
is that we were logging the `error` object, which would print not the
stack of the actual error, but rather the stack of where the console.error
was logged from. Printing `error.stack` instead shows much more accurate
stack traces.
See changes in the Edgehill repo here: 8c4a86eb7e
Test Plan: Manual
Reviewers: juan, bengotow
Reviewed By: bengotow
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2509
Summary:
1. **Generic CUD Tasks**: There is now a generic `CreateModelTask`,
`UpdateModelTask`, and `DestroyModelTask`. These can either be used as-is
or trivially overridden to easily update simple objects. Hopefully all of
the boilerplate rollback, error handling, and undo logic won't have to be
re-duplicated on every task. There are also tests for these tasks. We use
them to perform mutating actions on `Metadata` objects.
1. **Failing on Promise Rejects**: Turns out that if a Promise rejected
due to an error or `Promise.reject` we were ignoring it and letting tests
pass. Now, tests will Fail if any unhandled promise rejects. This
uncovered a variety of errors throughout the test suite that had to be
fixed. The most significant one was during the `theme-manager` tests when
all packages (and their stores with async DB requests) was loaded. Long
after the `theme-manager` specs finished, those DB requests were
(somtimes) silently failing.
1. **Globally stub `DatabaseStore._query`**: All tests shouldn't actually
make queries on the database. Furthremore, the `inTransaction` block
doesn't resolve at all unless `_query` is stubbed. Instead of manually
remembering to do this in every test that touches the DB, it's now mocked
in `spec_helper`. This broke a handful of tests that needed to be manually
fixed.
1. **ESLint Fixes**: Some minor fixes to the linter config to prevent
yelling about minor ES6 things and ensuring we have the correct parser.
Test Plan: new tests
Reviewers: bengotow, juan, drew
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2419
Remove cloudState and N1-Send-Later
Summary:
Until now, we've been hiding transactions beneath the surface. When you call persistModel, you're implicitly creating a transaction.
You could explicitly create them with `atomically`..., but there were several critical problems that are fixed in this diff:
- Calling persistModel / unpersistModel within a transaction could cause the DatabaseStore to trigger. This could result in other parts of the app making queries /during/
the transaction, potentially before the COMMIT occurred and saved the changes. The new, explicit inTransaction syntax holds all changes until after COMMIT and then triggers.
- Calling atomically and then calling persistModel inside that resulted in us having to check whether a transaction was present and was gross.
- Many parts of the code ran extensive logic inside a promise chained within `atomically`:
BAD:
```
DatabaseStore.atomically =>
DatabaseStore.persistModel(draft) =>
GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise
```
OVERWHELMINGLY BETTER:
```
DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>
t.persistModel(draft)
.then =>
GoMakeANetworkRequestThatReturnsAPromise
```
Having explicit transactions also puts us on equal footing with Sequelize and other ORMs. Note that you /have/ to call DatabaseStore.inTransaction (t) =>. There is no other way to access the methods that let you alter the database. :-)
Other changes:
- This diff removes Message.labels and the Message-Labels table. We weren't using Message-level labels anywhere, and the table could grow very large.
- This diff changes the page size during initial sync from 250 => 200 in an effort to make transactions a bit faster.
Test Plan: Run tests!
Reviewers: juan, evan
Reviewed By: juan, evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2353
Summary:
- Refactors account-sidebar internal package:
- Separates into smaller react components
- Makes DisclosureTriangle its own independent component
- Adds data to AccountSidebarStore to allow removal or addition of items for a
specific section of the sidebar
- Adds button and input and css styles to create categories
- Adds context menu to destroy a category
- Adds new method to CategoryStore to get the icon name for the categories of
the current account
- Removes some unused code
Test Plan: Manual
Reviewers: evan, bengotow
Reviewed By: bengotow
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D2283
