Summary:
Interrupt retryable syncback tasks that are taking too long so that we can
return control to the sync loop. The sync loop will retry the task later.
This diff adds a `forceReject` param to `interrupt()` so that we can return
control immediately instead of waiting for the current operation to finish
(for instance, the syncback task could be stuck in an imap operation, and a
normal interrupt would still have to wait for that to finish before returning
control to the callee)
Part of T7978
Test Plan: specs
Reviewers: evan, spang, mark, juan
Reviewed By: juan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D4269
In some places we were not accessing `.default` when using `require`,
and when using `import` we couldn't really destructure unless we
accessed `.default` too, or if the functions were regular exports
instead of properties on a default exported object.
This was causing our sync loop to error.
To remain consistent, we always just `require` or `import` the
SyncActivity singleton and access that
Summary: See title. Part of T7681.
Test Plan: ran the specs
Reviewers: evan, mark, juan
Reviewed By: juan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D4264
Arc land messed up and landed a not fully merged branch. (Seriously – I
had merged a copy of my branch with master to see how easy it would be.
Because I didn't want to merge the whole thing, I blindly committed my
changes and switched back to my real branch). To my great surprise, arc
decided to use the wrong branch when landing it.
Original commit message:
Summary:
Finally, here it is! Send later, with support for open tracking but
without support for attachments yet. It took me some time to find the
right way to do things.
**The send later dilemna**
There's two ways we could handle send later:
1. do everything on the client
2. process the message in the cloud
1. is very tempting because it would make the cloud server very
simple. Unfortunately, it has some serious limitations, for example,
setting the "Date" message header. That's why I chose to go with 2. When
a user presses the "Send Later" button, we save the open/link tracking
metadata and fills in all the required fields. I added a custom endpoint
to the K2 API to do this, `/drafts/build`. After that, we save the JSON
contents of the message as metadata.
When we process metadata, we simply create a MIME message from the
JSON and send it.
**Limitations**
Right now, send later doesn't support and attachments. There's also
some minor code duplication which needs to be refactored away.
Test Plan: Tested manually. Checked that regular send still worked, too.
Reviewers: mark, spang, halla, juan, evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D4054
Summary:
Finally, here it is! Send later, with support for open tracking but without support for attachments yet. It took me some time to find the right way to do things.
**The send later dilemna**
There's two ways we could handle send later:
1. do everything on the client
2. process the message in the cloud
1. is very tempting because it would make the cloud server very simple. Unfortunately, it has some serious limitations, for example, setting the "Date" message header. That's why I chose to go with 2. When a user presses the "Send Later" button, we save the open/link tracking metadata and fills in all the required fields. I added a custom endpoint to the K2 API to do this, `/drafts/build`. After that, we save the JSON contents of the message as metadata.
When we process metadata, we simply create a MIME message from the JSON and send it.
**Limitations**
Right now, send later doesn't support and attachments. There's also some minor code duplication which needs to be refactored away.
Test Plan: Tested manually. Checked that regular send still worked, too.
Reviewers: mark, spang, halla, juan, evan
Reviewed By: evan
Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D4054
