// const _ = require('underscore'); class ThreadingProcessor { pickMatchingThread(message, threads) { return threads.pop(); // This logic is tricky... Used to say that threads with >2 participants in common // should be treated as the same, plus special cases for when it's a 1<>1 // conversation. Put it back soonish. // const messageEmails = _.uniq([].concat(message.to, message.cc, message.from).map(p => p.email)); // console.log(`Found ${threads.length} candidate threads for message with subject: ${message.subject}`) // // for (const thread of threads) { // const threadEmails = _.uniq([].concat(thread.participants).map(p => p.email)); // console.log(`Intersection: ${_.intersection(threadEmails, messageEmails).join(',')}`) // // if (_.intersection(threadEmails, messageEmails) >= threadEmails.length * 0.9) { // return thread; // } // } // // return null; } cleanSubject(subject = "") { const regex = new RegExp(/^((re|fw|fwd|aw|wg|undeliverable|undelivered):\s*)+/ig); return subject.replace(regex, () => ""); } findOrCreateByMatching(db, message) { const {Thread} = db // in the future, we should look at In-reply-to. Problem is it's a single- // directional linked list, and we don't scan the mailbox from oldest=>newest, // but from newest->oldest, so when we ingest a message it's very unlikely // we have the "In-reply-to" message yet. return Thread.findAll({ where: { subject: this.cleanSubject(message.subject), }, order: [ ['id', 'DESC'], ], limit: 50, }).then((threads) => this.pickMatchingThread(message, threads) || Thread.build({}) ) } findOrCreateByThreadId({Thread}, threadId) { return Thread.find({where: {threadId}}).then((thread) => { return thread || Thread.build({threadId}); }) } processMessage({db, message}) { let findOrCreateThread = null; if (message.headers['x-gm-thrid']) { findOrCreateThread = this.findOrCreateByThreadId(db, message.headers['x-gm-thrid']) } else { findOrCreateThread = this.findOrCreateByMatching(db, message) } return Promise.props({ thread: findOrCreateThread, sentCategory: db.Category.find({where: {role: 'sent'}}), }) .then(({thread, sentCategory}) => { thread.addMessage(message); // update the subject on the thread thread.subject = this.cleanSubject(message.subject); thread.snippet = message.snippet; // update the participants on the thread const threadParticipants = [].concat(thread.participants); const threadEmails = thread.participants.map(p => p.email); for (const p of [].concat(message.to, message.cc, message.from)) { if (!threadEmails.includes(p.email)) { threadParticipants.push(p); threadEmails.push(p.email); } } thread.participants = threadParticipants; // update starred and unread if (thread.starredCount == null) { thread.starredCount = 0; } thread.starredCount += message.starred ? 1 : 0; if (thread.unreadCount == null) { thread.unreadCount = 0; } thread.unreadCount += message.unread ? 1 : 0; // update dates if (!thread.lastMessageDate || (message.date > thread.lastMessageDate)) { thread.lastMessageDate = message.date; } if (!thread.firstMessageDate || (message.date < thread.firstMessageDate)) { thread.firstMessageDate = message.date; } const sentCategoryId = sentCategory ? sentCategory.id : null; if ((message.CategoryId === sentCategoryId) && (message.date > thread.lastMessageSentDate)) { thread.lastMessageSentDate = message.date; } if ((message.CategoryId !== sentCategoryId) && (message.date > thread.lastMessageReceivedDate)) { thread.lastMessageReceivedDate = message.date; } // update categories and sav return thread.hasCategory(message.CategoryId).then((hasCategory) => { if (!hasCategory) { thread.addCategory(message.CategoryId) } return thread.save().then((saved) => { message.ThreadId = saved.id; return message; }); }); }); } } const processor = new ThreadingProcessor(); module.exports = { processMessage: processor.processMessage.bind(processor), order: 1, };