Christine Spang 99899be7c2 [models] Remove unnecessary Reply-To array length validation ... Summary: I have quite a few emails in my mailbox that have both multiple Reply-To addresses. This is perfectly OK by the spec. Fixes: T7369 Test Plan: regression test coming - making a list and planning to update all the tests once I've hammered out the current crop of fixes I've identified I also tested and made sure that N1 does the right thing in this case... multiple Reply-To addresses are displayed correctly, and when you hit "Reply" a new draft is started with both in the To: field. Makes sense given this is something the Python sync engine supported too. Reviewers: jackie Reviewed By: jackie Differential Revision: https://phab.nylas.com/D3558		2016-12-23 14:41:08 -08:00
..
isomorphic-core	perf(delta): replaces API delta stream with direct in-memory one	2016-12-21 18:42:52 -08:00
local-private	fix(tracking): Save updated metadata correctly and stop sending account ID with request	2016-12-19 15:40:38 -08:00
local-sync	[models] Remove unnecessary Reply-To array length validation	2016-12-23 14:41:08 -08:00