dnscontrol/providers/_all/all.go

// Package all is simply a container to reference all known provider implementations for easy import into other packages
package all

import (
	// Define all known providers here. They should each register themselves with the providers package via init function.
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/activedir"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/bind"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/cloudflare"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/digitalocean"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/dnsimple"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/gandi"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/gcloud"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/linode"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/namecheap"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/namedotcom"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/ns1"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/octodns"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/opensrs"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/ovh"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/route53"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/softlayer"
	_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/vultr"
)
Vet and Lint the entire system (#296) * govet and golint corrections 2018-01-10 01:53:16 +08:00			`// Package all is simply a container to reference all known provider implementations for easy import into other packages`
moving provider imports to dedicated package 2017-03-14 15:12:47 +08:00			`package all`

			`import (`
Vet and Lint the entire system (#296) * govet and golint corrections 2018-01-10 01:53:16 +08:00			`// Define all known providers here. They should each register themselves with the providers package via init function.`
moving provider imports to dedicated package 2017-03-14 15:12:47 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/activedir"`
			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/bind"`
			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/cloudflare"`
Digitalocean provider (#171) * Implement Digitalocean provider * Vendor digitalocean lib * Enable SRV for Digitalocean and fix the tests * Test cname etc. records pointing to the same domain 2017-08-11 04:31:20 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/digitalocean"`
DNSimple provider (#43) * Implement a basic DNSimple provider. Handles domain delegation as well as record create, update, and delete. Note that this is completely untested at the moment. It’s so alpha it might burn your face off. * Add some inline comments. Always use the StackExchange libs. * Clean up dnsimple docs a little * This will need to be changed before merging. * Import the dnsimple dnscontrol package from its expected path * Properly build the FQDN and implement record listing so create/update/delete are used correctly. * Add support for overriding base URL to allow connection to sandbox. * Vendor dnsimple-go and its dependencies. * Remove unnecessary doc file. * Use dnsutil.AddOrigin for combining record name and origin. * Modifying dnsimple provider to pass tests 2017-03-19 09:58:47 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/dnsimple"`
moving provider imports to dedicated package 2017-03-14 15:12:47 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/gandi"`
Rename source files that don't match the name/nameProvider.go standard. (#261) 2017-11-08 04:54:28 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/gcloud"`
New provider: Linode (#268) 2017-11-15 12:08:06 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/linode"`
moving provider imports to dedicated package 2017-03-14 15:12:47 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/namecheap"`
			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/namedotcom"`
Ns1 provider (#63) * add ns1 libs to vendor * Create shim and wire into tests * ns1 provider more working. * vendor correct files * comment diff functions * ns1 docs * making mx work with ns1 * ? * refactor tests to make capability blocks easier. fix up ns1 2017-09-13 23:49:15 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/ns1"`
NEW PROVIDER: OctoDNS (#309) * govendor gopkg.in/yaml.v2 * Ignore YAML and BIND test data litter. Create README.txt files to force git to create subdirectories. * Update convertzone to also read OctoDNS files 2018-02-28 06:36:47 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/octodns"`
NEW REGISTRAR: OpenSRS (#275) * Initial commit for OpenSRS registrar support #272 * sort existing name servers before comparing. * vendor philhug/opensrs-go * Update docs for OpenSRS #272 * Cache OpenSRS client to prevent http connection leak * run go fmt 2018-03-05 12:07:22 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/opensrs"`
New Provider: OVH DNS Provider (#143) (#175) * OVH DNS Provider (#143) This adds the OVH Provider along with its documentation. Unfortunately we can't set this DNS provider to support `CanUsePTR`, because OVH only supports setting PTR target on the Arpa zone. * OVH Registrar provider (#143) This implements OVH as a registrar provider. Note that NS modifications are done in a "best effort" mode, as the provider doesn't wait for the modifications to be fully applied (the operation that can take a long time). * Allow support for dual providers scenarios Since OVH released their APIv6, it is now possible to update zone apex NS records, opening the door to complete dual providers scenarii. This change implements apex NS management in an OVH zone. 2017-11-11 03:02:34 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/ovh"`
moving provider imports to dedicated package 2017-03-14 15:12:47 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/route53"`
Add SoftLayer DNS provider (#59) Add SoftLayer DNS as a DomainServiceProvider. The SoftLayer API is a bit of a mess and treats MX and SRV records differently. This leads to some replication and custom handling issues to work around. In this patch I have to change the SRV test case to be _tcp instead of _protocol because softlayer requires a "known" protocol which AFAICT is tcp, udp or tls. I think this will be acceptable in most cases. Signed-off-by: Jamie Lennox <jamielennox@gmail.com> 2017-09-27 01:14:53 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/softlayer"`
Added Vultr provider (#217) (#219) * Added Vultr provider * Fixed tests * Fixed CI build validation * Add unsupported features * Added #rtype_variations tags according to stackexchange.github.io/dnscontrol/adding-new-rtypes * Add title (for compatibility with #223) * Removed extra rtype_variations 2017-10-12 21:21:36 +08:00			`_ "github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/providers/vultr"`
moving provider imports to dedicated package 2017-03-14 15:12:47 +08:00			`)`