mirror of
https://github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol.git
synced 2024-12-27 02:02:48 +08:00
minor editing (#39)
This commit is contained in:
parent
94031d08da
commit
36c7911926
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ After this process we have a list of "Authoritative Nameservers" for the domain.
|
|||
|
||||
As much as possible, all dns servers should agree on this nameserver list, and serve identical NS records. DNSControl will generate
|
||||
NS records for the authoritative nameserver list and automatically add them to the domain's records.
|
||||
NS records for the base domain should not be specidied manually, as that will result in an error.
|
||||
NS records for the base domain should not be specified manually, as that will result in an error.
|
||||
|
||||
{% include alert.html text="Note: Not all providers allow full control over the NS records of your zone. It is not recommended to use these providers in complicated scenarios such as hosting across multiple providers. See individual provider docs for more info." %}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Yes, we could layer rule upon rule upon rule. Eventually we'd get
|
|||
all the rules right. However, now a user would have to know all the
|
||||
rules to be able to use Dnscontrol. The point of the Dnscontrol DSL
|
||||
is to enable the casual user to be able to make DNS updates. By
|
||||
"casual user" we mean someone someone that lives and breathes DNS
|
||||
"casual user" we do not mean someone someone that lives and breathes DNS
|
||||
like you and I do. In fact, we mean someone that hasn't memorized
|
||||
the list of rules.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -93,4 +93,4 @@ future solutions from being upward compatible. By simply giving an
|
|||
error we open the door to new solutions.
|
||||
|
||||
We should warn you, however, that any new proposals should be
|
||||
simplier than "add a dot".
|
||||
simpler than "add a dot".
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue