mirror of
https://github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol.git
synced 2025-01-31 03:53:13 +08:00
DOCS: Typo Dnscontrol
= DNSControl
. (#1969)
Co-authored-by: Tom Limoncelli <tlimoncelli@stackoverflow.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d53260703e
commit
9bda481e7e
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ else, please do the appropriate equivalent command.
|
|||
|
||||
## Caveats
|
||||
|
||||
1. Dnscontrol 'gives up' if it sees SPF records it can't understand.
|
||||
1. DNSControl 'gives up' if it sees SPF records it can't understand.
|
||||
This includes: syntax errors, features that our spflib doesn't know
|
||||
about, overly complex SPF settings, and anything else that we we
|
||||
didn't feel like implementing.
|
||||
|
@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ TXT record (not an SPF record, perhaps a TXT record used to verify
|
|||
domain ownership), the total packet size of all the TXT records
|
||||
could exceed 512 bytes, and will require EDNS or a TCP request.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Dnscontrol does not warn if the number of lookups exceeds 10.
|
||||
3. DNSControl does not warn if the number of lookups exceeds 10.
|
||||
We hope to implement this some day.
|
||||
|
||||
4. The `redirect=` directive is only partially implemented. We only
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ This command is intended to be just a small part of a full certificate automatio
|
|||
This command is intended to be run as frequently as you desire. One workflow would be to check all certificates into a git repository and run a nightly build that:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Clones the cert repo, and the dns config repo (if separate).
|
||||
2. Decrypt or otherwise obtain the *Let's Encrypt* account private key. Dnscontrol does not need to read any certificate private keys to check or issue certificates.
|
||||
2. Decrypt or otherwise obtain the *Let's Encrypt* account private key. DNSControl does not need to read any certificate private keys to check or issue certificates.
|
||||
3. Run `dnscontrol get-certs` with appropriate flags.
|
||||
4. Encrypt or store any new or updated private keys.
|
||||
5. Commit and push any changes to the cert repo.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ How are they ambiguous?
|
|||
|
||||
Yes, we could layer rule upon rule upon rule. Eventually we'd get
|
||||
all the rules right. However, now a user would have to know all the
|
||||
rules to be able to use Dnscontrol. The point of the Dnscontrol DSL
|
||||
rules to be able to use DNSControl. The point of the DNSControl DSL
|
||||
is to enable the casual user to be able to make DNS updates. By
|
||||
"casual user" we do not mean someone someone that lives and breathes DNS
|
||||
like you and I do. In fact, we mean someone that hasn't memorized
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue