* Replace Jekyll highlight tags with fenced code blocks
Replace Jekyll highlight tags with fenced code blocks.
Canonicalize javascript to js.
Correct highlighting languages.
Add highlighting to code blocks.
Remove leading $ from bash blocks.
Remove empty lines at start and end of code blocks.
Stripped trailing whitespace.
* Fix language of code highlighting
* Add multiple string support to SPF optimizer
Notes:
* This implements [RFC 4408][rfc] for the SPF optimizer. Allowing for
more SPF records to fit within the 10 lookups by using multiple strings.
* By default the max size of the TXT remains at 255. Meaning users will
still only get a single 255 length string unless they modify `txtMaxSize`
and opt into this feature.
* The general recommendation when using multiple strings for TXT records
is to keep the size within a single UDP packet. It seems like the
maximum size for this depends on a bunch of factors that are sometimes
outside of your control. A similar tool has a [formula for estimating the
maximum allowed size][formula]. However I felt giving a user
configurable size would fit with the current configuration style that
dnscontrol has. Similar to how dnscontrol recommends only flattening a
record if absolutely needed, I can see this length being increased by
only enough to get you within 10 lookups.
[rfc]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4408#section-3.1.3
[formula]: https://github.com/oasys/mkspf/blob/master/Overhead.md
* Add a nice comment for the Chunks function
Open to other configuration opens for how best to make this optional. Or
potentially making this an opt in configuration item which would be a
breaking change.
The main reason that someone would want to disable this is if their raw
SPF record goes over the 255 characters. This is potentially another
place that could get some multi string support. But as it is only used
for debugging purposes it seems like there should be a way to outright
disable it too.
FYI: The support is very minimal. It only supports redirect if it is the last item in an SPF record. At that point, it is equivalent to include.
* In SFP, treat redirect like a special include.
* Document SPF redirect: limited implementation.
