mirror of
https://github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol.git
synced 2025-12-09 13:46:07 +08:00
6153e3bac9
The PR follows https://github.com/StackExchange/dnscontrol/pull/3542 Found some bugs when running intergration tests locally again, and the PR is an attempt to fix them: - When updating/creating HTTPS/SRV records, Vercel API only reads from the corresponding struct (either `srv` or `https`). If we provide a `value`, the Vercel API will reject with an error. - The PR makes `Value` "nil-able", and sets `Value` to nil when dealing with `SRV` or `HTTPS` records. - When updating a record, currently, we treat the empty SVC param as omitting the field. But with Vercel's API, omitting a field means not updating the field. We need to explicitly make the field an empty string to create/update an empty SVC param, and the PR does that. - Vercel implements an unknown `ech=` parameter validation process for HTTPS records. The validation process is unknown, undocumented, thus I can't implement a `rejectif` for `AuditRecord`. - Let's make this a known caveat, describe it in the provider docs, skip these intergration tests, and move on. Please tag this PR w/ `provider-VERCEL`. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| api.go | ||
| auditrecords.go | ||
| auditrecords_test.go | ||
| request.go | ||
| vercelProvider.go | ||