mirror of
https://github.com/juanfont/headscale.git
synced 2024-11-10 17:12:33 +08:00
1766e6b5df
There was a lot of tests that actually threw a lot of errors and that did not pass all the way because we didnt check everything. This commit should fix all of these cases. Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com>
1014 lines
25 KiB
Go
1014 lines
25 KiB
Go
package integration
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"net/netip"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/hscontrol/policy"
|
|
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/hsic"
|
|
"github.com/juanfont/headscale/integration/tsic"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
var veryLargeDestination = []string{
|
|
"0.0.0.0/5:*",
|
|
"8.0.0.0/7:*",
|
|
"11.0.0.0/8:*",
|
|
"12.0.0.0/6:*",
|
|
"16.0.0.0/4:*",
|
|
"32.0.0.0/3:*",
|
|
"64.0.0.0/2:*",
|
|
"128.0.0.0/3:*",
|
|
"160.0.0.0/5:*",
|
|
"168.0.0.0/6:*",
|
|
"172.0.0.0/12:*",
|
|
"172.32.0.0/11:*",
|
|
"172.64.0.0/10:*",
|
|
"172.128.0.0/9:*",
|
|
"173.0.0.0/8:*",
|
|
"174.0.0.0/7:*",
|
|
"176.0.0.0/4:*",
|
|
"192.0.0.0/9:*",
|
|
"192.128.0.0/11:*",
|
|
"192.160.0.0/13:*",
|
|
"192.169.0.0/16:*",
|
|
"192.170.0.0/15:*",
|
|
"192.172.0.0/14:*",
|
|
"192.176.0.0/12:*",
|
|
"192.192.0.0/10:*",
|
|
"193.0.0.0/8:*",
|
|
"194.0.0.0/7:*",
|
|
"196.0.0.0/6:*",
|
|
"200.0.0.0/5:*",
|
|
"208.0.0.0/4:*",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func aclScenario(
|
|
t *testing.T,
|
|
policy *policy.ACLPolicy,
|
|
clientsPerUser int,
|
|
) *Scenario {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
scenario, err := NewScenario()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
spec := map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": clientsPerUser,
|
|
"user2": clientsPerUser,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
err = scenario.CreateHeadscaleEnv(spec,
|
|
[]tsic.Option{
|
|
// Alpine containers dont have ip6tables set up, which causes
|
|
// tailscaled to stop configuring the wgengine, causing it
|
|
// to not configure DNS.
|
|
tsic.WithNetfilter("off"),
|
|
tsic.WithDockerEntrypoint([]string{
|
|
"/bin/sh",
|
|
"-c",
|
|
"/bin/sleep 3 ; apk add python3 curl ; update-ca-certificates ; python3 -m http.server --bind :: 80 & tailscaled --tun=tsdev",
|
|
}),
|
|
tsic.WithDockerWorkdir("/"),
|
|
},
|
|
hsic.WithACLPolicy(policy),
|
|
hsic.WithTestName("acl"),
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
_, err = scenario.ListTailscaleClientsFQDNs()
|
|
assertNoErrListFQDN(t, err)
|
|
|
|
return scenario
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This tests a different ACL mechanism, if a host _cannot_ connect
|
|
// to another node at all based on ACL, it should just not be part
|
|
// of the NetMap sent to the host. This is slightly different than
|
|
// the other tests as we can just check if the hosts are present
|
|
// or not.
|
|
func TestACLHostsInNetMapTable(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: All want cases currently checks the
|
|
// total count of expected peers, this would
|
|
// typically be the client count of the users
|
|
// they can access minus one (them self).
|
|
tests := map[string]struct {
|
|
users map[string]int
|
|
policy policy.ACLPolicy
|
|
want map[string]int
|
|
}{
|
|
// Test that when we have no ACL, each client netmap has
|
|
// the amount of peers of the total amount of clients
|
|
"base-acls": {
|
|
users: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 2,
|
|
"user2": 2,
|
|
},
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"*"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"*:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 3, // ns1 + ns2
|
|
"user2": 3, // ns2 + ns1
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
// Test that when we have two users, which cannot see
|
|
// eachother, each node has only the number of pairs from
|
|
// their own user.
|
|
"two-isolated-users": {
|
|
users: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 2,
|
|
"user2": 2,
|
|
},
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 1,
|
|
"user2": 1,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
// Test that when we have two users, with ACLs and they
|
|
// are restricted to a single port, nodes are still present
|
|
// in the netmap.
|
|
"two-restricted-present-in-netmap": {
|
|
users: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 2,
|
|
"user2": 2,
|
|
},
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:22"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:22"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:22"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:22"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 3,
|
|
"user2": 3,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
// Test that when we have two users, that are isolated,
|
|
// but one can see the others, we have the appropriate number
|
|
// of peers. This will still result in all the peers as we
|
|
// need them present on the other side for the "return path".
|
|
"two-ns-one-isolated": {
|
|
users: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 2,
|
|
"user2": 2,
|
|
},
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user1:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 3, // ns1 + ns2
|
|
"user2": 3, // ns1 + ns2 (return path)
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"very-large-destination-prefix-1372": {
|
|
users: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 2,
|
|
"user2": 2,
|
|
},
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: append([]string{"user1:*"}, veryLargeDestination...),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user2"},
|
|
Destinations: append([]string{"user2:*"}, veryLargeDestination...),
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: append([]string{"user2:*"}, veryLargeDestination...),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 3, // ns1 + ns2
|
|
"user2": 3, // ns1 + ns2 (return path)
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"ipv6-acls-1470": {
|
|
users: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 2,
|
|
"user2": 2,
|
|
},
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"*"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"0.0.0.0/0:*", "::/0:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}, want: map[string]int{
|
|
"user1": 3, // ns1 + ns2
|
|
"user2": 3, // ns2 + ns1
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for name, testCase := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
scenario, err := NewScenario()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
spec := testCase.users
|
|
|
|
err = scenario.CreateHeadscaleEnv(spec,
|
|
[]tsic.Option{},
|
|
hsic.WithACLPolicy(&testCase.policy),
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
defer scenario.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
allClients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
err = scenario.WaitForTailscaleSyncWithPeerCount(testCase.want["user1"])
|
|
assertNoErrSync(t, err)
|
|
|
|
for _, client := range allClients {
|
|
status, err := client.Status()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
user := status.User[status.Self.UserID].LoginName
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(t, (testCase.want[user]), len(status.Peer))
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test to confirm that we can use user:80 from one user
|
|
// This should make the node appear in the peer list, but
|
|
// disallow ping.
|
|
// This ACL will not allow user1 access its own machines.
|
|
// Reported: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/699
|
|
func TestACLAllowUser80Dst(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
scenario := aclScenario(t,
|
|
&policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:80"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
1,
|
|
)
|
|
defer scenario.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
user1Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user1")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
user2Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user2")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Test that user1 can visit all user2
|
|
for _, client := range user1Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user2Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Len(t, result, 13)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test that user2 _cannot_ visit user1
|
|
for _, client := range user2Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user1Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestACLDenyAllPort80(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
scenario := aclScenario(t,
|
|
&policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
Groups: map[string][]string{
|
|
"group:integration-acl-test": {"user1", "user2"},
|
|
},
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"group:integration-acl-test"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"*:22"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
4,
|
|
)
|
|
defer scenario.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
allClients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
allHostnames, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClientsFQDNs()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
for _, client := range allClients {
|
|
for _, hostname := range allHostnames {
|
|
// We will always be allowed to check _self_ so shortcircuit
|
|
// the test here.
|
|
if strings.Contains(hostname, client.Hostname()) {
|
|
continue
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", hostname)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test to confirm that we can use user:* from one user.
|
|
// This ACL will not allow user1 access its own machines.
|
|
// Reported: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/699
|
|
func TestACLAllowUserDst(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
scenario := aclScenario(t,
|
|
&policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"user2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
2,
|
|
)
|
|
defer scenario.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
user1Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user1")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
user2Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user2")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Test that user1 can visit all user2
|
|
for _, client := range user1Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user2Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Len(t, result, 13)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test that user2 _cannot_ visit user1
|
|
for _, client := range user2Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user1Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test to confirm that we can use *:* from one user
|
|
// Reported: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/699
|
|
func TestACLAllowStarDst(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
scenario := aclScenario(t,
|
|
&policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"user1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"*:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
2,
|
|
)
|
|
defer scenario.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
user1Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user1")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
user2Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user2")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Test that user1 can visit all user2
|
|
for _, client := range user1Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user2Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Len(t, result, 13)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test that user2 _cannot_ visit user1
|
|
for _, client := range user2Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user1Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestACLNamedHostsCanReachBySubnet is the same as
|
|
// TestACLNamedHostsCanReach, but it tests if we expand a
|
|
// full CIDR correctly. All routes should work.
|
|
func TestACLNamedHostsCanReachBySubnet(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
scenario := aclScenario(t,
|
|
&policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
Hosts: policy.Hosts{
|
|
"all": netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.0/24"),
|
|
},
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
// Everyone can curl test3
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"*"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"all:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
3,
|
|
)
|
|
defer scenario.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
user1Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user1")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
user2Clients, err := scenario.ListTailscaleClients("user2")
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// Test that user1 can visit all user2
|
|
for _, client := range user1Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user2Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Len(t, result, 13)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Test that user2 can visit all user1
|
|
for _, client := range user2Clients {
|
|
for _, peer := range user1Clients {
|
|
fqdn, err := peer.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
url := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", fqdn)
|
|
t.Logf("url from %s to %s", client.Hostname(), url)
|
|
|
|
result, err := client.Curl(url)
|
|
assert.Len(t, result, 13)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This test aims to cover cases where individual hosts are allowed and denied
|
|
// access based on their assigned hostname
|
|
// https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/941
|
|
//
|
|
// ACL = [{
|
|
// "DstPorts": [{
|
|
// "Bits": null,
|
|
// "IP": "100.64.0.3/32",
|
|
// "Ports": {
|
|
// "First": 0,
|
|
// "Last": 65535
|
|
// }
|
|
// }],
|
|
// "SrcIPs": ["*"]
|
|
// }, {
|
|
//
|
|
// "DstPorts": [{
|
|
// "Bits": null,
|
|
// "IP": "100.64.0.2/32",
|
|
// "Ports": {
|
|
// "First": 0,
|
|
// "Last": 65535
|
|
// }
|
|
// }],
|
|
// "SrcIPs": ["100.64.0.1/32"]
|
|
// }]
|
|
//
|
|
// ACL Cache Map= {
|
|
// "*": {
|
|
// "100.64.0.3/32": {}
|
|
// },
|
|
// "100.64.0.1/32": {
|
|
// "100.64.0.2/32": {}
|
|
// }
|
|
// }
|
|
//
|
|
// https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/941
|
|
// Additionally verify ipv6 behaviour, part of
|
|
// https://github.com/juanfont/headscale/issues/809
|
|
func TestACLNamedHostsCanReach(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
tests := map[string]struct {
|
|
policy policy.ACLPolicy
|
|
}{
|
|
"ipv4": {
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
Hosts: policy.Hosts{
|
|
"test1": netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
|
"test2": netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.2/32"),
|
|
"test3": netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.3/32"),
|
|
},
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
// Everyone can curl test3
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"*"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"test3:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
// test1 can curl test2
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"test1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"test2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"ipv6": {
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
Hosts: policy.Hosts{
|
|
"test1": netip.MustParsePrefix("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1/128"),
|
|
"test2": netip.MustParsePrefix("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2/128"),
|
|
"test3": netip.MustParsePrefix("fd7a:115c:a1e0::3/128"),
|
|
},
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
// Everyone can curl test3
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"*"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"test3:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
// test1 can curl test2
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"test1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"test2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for name, testCase := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
scenario := aclScenario(t,
|
|
&testCase.policy,
|
|
2,
|
|
)
|
|
defer scenario.Shutdown()
|
|
|
|
// Since user/users dont matter here, we basically expect that some clients
|
|
// will be assigned these ips and that we can pick them up for our own use.
|
|
test1ip4 := netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.1")
|
|
test1ip6 := netip.MustParseAddr("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1")
|
|
test1, err := scenario.FindTailscaleClientByIP(test1ip6)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
test1fqdn, err := test1.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
test1ip4URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test1ip4.String())
|
|
test1ip6URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://[%s]/etc/hostname", test1ip6.String())
|
|
test1fqdnURL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test1fqdn)
|
|
|
|
test2ip4 := netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.2")
|
|
test2ip6 := netip.MustParseAddr("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2")
|
|
test2, err := scenario.FindTailscaleClientByIP(test2ip6)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
test2fqdn, err := test2.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
test2ip4URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test2ip4.String())
|
|
test2ip6URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://[%s]/etc/hostname", test2ip6.String())
|
|
test2fqdnURL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test2fqdn)
|
|
|
|
test3ip4 := netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.3")
|
|
test3ip6 := netip.MustParseAddr("fd7a:115c:a1e0::3")
|
|
test3, err := scenario.FindTailscaleClientByIP(test3ip6)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
test3fqdn, err := test3.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
test3ip4URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test3ip4.String())
|
|
test3ip6URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://[%s]/etc/hostname", test3ip6.String())
|
|
test3fqdnURL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test3fqdn)
|
|
|
|
// test1 can query test3
|
|
result, err := test1.Curl(test3ip4URL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test3 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test3ip4URL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test1.Curl(test3ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test3 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test3ip6URL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test1.Curl(test3fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test3 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test3fqdnURL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// test2 can query test3
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test3ip4URL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test3 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test3ip4URL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test3ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test3 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test3ip6URL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test3fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test3 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test3fqdnURL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// test3 cannot query test1
|
|
result, err = test3.Curl(test1ip4URL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test3.Curl(test1ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test3.Curl(test1fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// test3 cannot query test2
|
|
result, err = test3.Curl(test2ip4URL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test3.Curl(test2ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test3.Curl(test2fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// test1 can query test2
|
|
result, err = test1.Curl(test2ip4URL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test2 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test2ip4URL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
result, err = test1.Curl(test2ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test2 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test2ip6URL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test1.Curl(test2fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test2 with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test2fqdnURL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
// test2 cannot query test1
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test1ip4URL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test1ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test1fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestACLDevice1CanAccessDevice2 is a table driven test that aims to test
|
|
// the various ways to achieve a connection between device1 and device2 where
|
|
// device1 can access device2, but not the other way around. This can be
|
|
// viewed as one of the most important tests here as it covers most of the
|
|
// syntax that can be used.
|
|
//
|
|
// Before adding new taste cases, consider if it can be reduced to a case
|
|
// in this function.
|
|
func TestACLDevice1CanAccessDevice2(t *testing.T) {
|
|
IntegrationSkip(t)
|
|
|
|
tests := map[string]struct {
|
|
policy policy.ACLPolicy
|
|
}{
|
|
"ipv4": {
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"100.64.0.1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"100.64.0.2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"ipv6": {
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"fd7a:115c:a1e0::1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"fd7a:115c:a1e0::2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"hostv4cidr": {
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
Hosts: policy.Hosts{
|
|
"test1": netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.1/32"),
|
|
"test2": netip.MustParsePrefix("100.64.0.2/32"),
|
|
},
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"test1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"test2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"hostv6cidr": {
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
Hosts: policy.Hosts{
|
|
"test1": netip.MustParsePrefix("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1/128"),
|
|
"test2": netip.MustParsePrefix("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2/128"),
|
|
},
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"test1"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"test2:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
"group": {
|
|
policy: policy.ACLPolicy{
|
|
Groups: map[string][]string{
|
|
"group:one": {"user1"},
|
|
"group:two": {"user2"},
|
|
},
|
|
ACLs: []policy.ACL{
|
|
{
|
|
Action: "accept",
|
|
Sources: []string{"group:one"},
|
|
Destinations: []string{"group:two:*"},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
// TODO(kradalby): Add similar tests for Tags, might need support
|
|
// in the scenario function when we create or join the clients.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for name, testCase := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
scenario := aclScenario(t, &testCase.policy, 1)
|
|
|
|
test1ip := netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.1")
|
|
test1ip6 := netip.MustParseAddr("fd7a:115c:a1e0::1")
|
|
test1, err := scenario.FindTailscaleClientByIP(test1ip)
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, test1)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
test1fqdn, err := test1.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
test1ipURL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test1ip.String())
|
|
test1ip6URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://[%s]/etc/hostname", test1ip6.String())
|
|
test1fqdnURL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test1fqdn)
|
|
|
|
test2ip := netip.MustParseAddr("100.64.0.2")
|
|
test2ip6 := netip.MustParseAddr("fd7a:115c:a1e0::2")
|
|
test2, err := scenario.FindTailscaleClientByIP(test2ip)
|
|
assert.NotNil(t, test2)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
test2fqdn, err := test2.FQDN()
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
test2ipURL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test2ip.String())
|
|
test2ip6URL := fmt.Sprintf("http://[%s]/etc/hostname", test2ip6.String())
|
|
test2fqdnURL := fmt.Sprintf("http://%s/etc/hostname", test2fqdn)
|
|
|
|
// test1 can query test2
|
|
result, err := test1.Curl(test2ipURL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test2ipURL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test1.Curl(test2ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test2ip6URL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test1.Curl(test2fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Lenf(
|
|
t,
|
|
result,
|
|
13,
|
|
"failed to connect from test1 to test with URL %s, expected hostname of 13 chars, got %s",
|
|
test2fqdnURL,
|
|
result,
|
|
)
|
|
assertNoErr(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test1ipURL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test1ip6URL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
|
|
result, err = test2.Curl(test1fqdnURL)
|
|
assert.Empty(t, result)
|
|
assert.Error(t, err)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|